A study by Dodge Data & Analytics, a research firm for the construction industry, reveals that the health of people who occupy a building is often influenced by where and how a building is situated, how it’s made and how it is maintained.
Negative effects of buildings can range from subtle to physically debilitating. For example, aesthetics ignored in a workspace, like the absence of art or indoor plants, may cause someone to feel less at home, or to just not love their workplace. The presence of a gym or company cafeteria would swing the mood in a more positive way. Adding daylight also helps. A poor choice of construction material could cause outgassing or improper airflow that may actually make people sick.
While architects can certainly take advantage of such findings, Dodge is hoping that they will also share this data with HR departments. Being aware of how a company’s workforce is more likely to jump out of bed to start their day in your building, rather than find excuses to avoid it, is bound to add points to your proposed design.
Dodge shows that while three-quarters of all building owners would like to see better employee and tenant satisfaction, the ratios of architects is pretty close behind (68 percent). But half of the contractors surveyed couldn’t be bothered with it, and interior designers care even less (41 percent).
But Dodge finds that site owners have seen improvements in employee and tenant satisfaction and have seen a medium improvement in…